Study Shows Decarb Doubts Among Finance Execs

Oct. 8, 2021
Deloitte recently conducted a survey of nearly 140 U.S. energy and manufacturing financial executives.

Decarbonization is more a costly undertaking rather than an investment.

That is a conclusion from a recent Deloitte survey of nearly 140 U.S. energy and manufacturing financial executives. Deloitte observed that most CFOs and financial executives surveyed revealed they are not directly involved in setting decarbonization strategy at their respective energy and manufacturing companies. In a corresponding study, the consultancy notes that financial execs struggle with how to make their firms’ portfolios greener while meeting shareholder expectations on the balance sheet.

Specific takeaways from Deloitte’s survey of financial executives include:

  • 73% stated their organizations have a decarbonization strategy but fewer than one-half of individuals surveyed stated they have participated in its development.
  • Just 17% view money spent on decarbonization as a profitable investment.
  • More than 50% see the lack of clear and consistent environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting guidelines as the biggest impediment to decarbonization strategies.
  • Organizations that afford their financial execs larger roles in shaping decarbonization strategy and invest more heavily in green initiatives have found a cash flow equation to fund said endeavors. Organizations that are less engaged in decarbonization follow a traditional cash flow allocation.

“The investment challenges inherent in transitioning to a new low-carbon economy provide a unique opportunity to financial executives to lead in one of the world’s biggest business and financial transformations,” stated Deloitte. “ESG metrics are becoming as important as earnings per share, meaning that the perspective and role of the CFO’s office should stay one step ahead in this evolving environment.”

Dividing survey participants in the “Future-focused” and “Conventional” camps, Deloitte observed key differences in how their respective organizations pay for efforts to implement their decarbonization strategies. The graphic below from Deloitte compares the Future-focused and Conventional approaches.

 The full report is available on Deloitte’s website.

About the Author

EnergyTech Staff

Rod Walton is senior editor for EnergyTech.com. He has spent 14 years covering the energy industry as a newspaper and trade journalist.

Walton formerly was energy writer and business editor at the Tulsa World. Later, he spent six years covering the electricity power sector for Pennwell and Clarion Events. He joined Endeavor and EnergyTech in November 2021.

He can be reached at [email protected]

EnergyTech is focused on the mission critical and large-scale energy users and their sustainability and resiliency goals. These include the commercial and industrial sectors, as well as the military, universities, data centers and microgrids.

Many large-scale energy users such as Fortune 500 companies, and mission-critical users such as military bases, universities, healthcare facilities, public safety and data centers, shifting their energy priorities to reach net-zero carbon goals within the coming decades. These include plans for renewable energy power purchase agreements, but also on-site resiliency projects such as microgrids, combined heat and power, rooftop solar, energy storage, digitalization and building efficiency upgrades.